Navigate this section
- The Making of the ADA
- There Oughta’ Be a Law: The Bob Brunner Story
- To the National Council
- Toward Independence and the Vision of an ADA
- Developing the 1986 Report and the Dart-Burgdorf Summit
- Selecting Report Topics and Overall Approach
- Topic Papers Including One on Equal Opportunity Laws
- How the ADA Got Its Name
- Shaping the Summary 1986 Report
- Dr. Farbman Comes Into the Picture
- Themes and Potential Titles of the Report
- Analysis of Federal Programs, and Disability Demographics
- Full Draft of Report
- Approval of Report
- Deciding the Title of the Report
- Preclearance of Report? and Final Touches
- Significant Additions to NCD Staff
- Pre-Briefing and a Pre-Release Attack on the Equal Opportunity Laws Proposal
- Overview of Final Toward Independence Package
- Last-Minute Obstacle and a Horrible Twist of Fate
- Prelude to Drafting the Original ADA Bill
- Issuance of Toward Independence
- Preview Briefing on Harris Poll of People with Disabilities
- Accessibility of Statue of Liberty and “Continental Quest”
- Accessibility of National Parks
- What Is a Wheelchair and Is a User a “Pedestrian”?
- Formal Release of Toward Independence
- Final Results of Harris Poll of People with Disabilities
- Other Council Responsibilities
- Memo Explaining and Defending Equal Opportunity Law Proposal
- Congressional Mandate of 1988 Follow-up Report
- Drafting and Introduction of the Original ADA Bill
- My Approach and Early Snippets of a Bill
- My First Partial Draft
- Input from Close Colleagues
- Outline Elements of an Equal Opportunity Law
- Composing My First Full Draft
- Council Meeting in Miami
- Early Input on Council’s ADA Approach
- Brad Reynolds’s Piecemeal Approach
- Council Meeting and Go-Ahead to Draft ADA Bill
- Fair Housing Amendments Legislation
- First Full Draft and Gameplan for Introduction
- Refining First Draft and Contacts with Capitol Hill
- Addressing Unexpected Opposition
- Negotiations over Acceptable Elements
- On the Threshold of Independence and High-Stakes Council Meeting
- Deaf Attorneys, American Indian Tribes, and Finalizing the Council’s Bill
- Introduction of 1988 ADA Bill and the 100th Congress
- 1988 ADA Congressional Hearings and End of 100th Congress
- Dancing to Our Music: Impact and Legacy of 1988 ADA Bill
Toward Independence and the Vision of an ADA - Part 15
Overview of the Final Toward Independence Package
Such last-minute wrinkles aside, the Council was ready to release its 1986 congressionally mandated report, Toward Independence: An Assessment of Federal Laws and Programs Affecting Persons with Disabilities – With Legislative Recommendations, at its meeting in DC on January 29 – 31, 1986. The summary report consisted of 75 pages (7-by-10½-inches) of text plus 10 pages of front matter, including a Letter of Transmittal and an Executive Summary. It featured 45 legislative recommendations, addressed to the Congress and the President, in the ten topic areas. The recommendations represented a compilation of many of the best current ideas on addressing problems in each topic area. NCD prioritized the advancement of "equal opportunity laws" for people with disabilities by making the first and primary recommendation in the report a call for a comprehensive federal law prohibiting discrimination based on disability, named something like the Americans with Disabilities Act. The summary report also highlighted the Council’s general observations on priorities in federal programs:
- Approximately two-thirds of working-age persons with disabilities do not receive Social Security or other public assistance income.
- Federal disability programs reflect an overemphasis on income support and an underemphasis of initiatives for equal opportunity, independence, prevention, and self-sufficiency.
- More emphasis should be given to Federal programs encouraging and assisting private sector efforts to promote opportunities and independence for individuals with disabilities.
In addition, the report contained an Introduction, the section on “The Population with Disabilities,” the fold-out chart of “Key Federal Programs and Corresponding Legislative Committees,” and the list of the 45 largest federal programs affecting people with disabilities in order of expenditures.
Issued with the summary report, the Appendix to Toward Independence was made available from the Council upon request, and also by purchase from the Government Printing Office. The Appendix contained the full text of the 10 topic papers, and, at more than 440 8½-by-11-inch pages, made quite a hefty volume. The papers provided background information on the issues addressed by the recommendations and fleshed out the rationales for the recommended approaches.
The full Toward Independence package – the summary report plus the Appendix – was an honest but measured product. Although many of the recommendations were derived from previously proposed initiatives and insights, some of them were innovative and progressive. To make the various proposals palatable to a broad range of people, the Council emphasized an underlying economic rationale. The summary report noted that “the current annual Federal expenditure on disability benefits and programs exceeds $60 billion”; and that ten large public aid programs, for which eligibility is based upon inability to engage in substantial gainful activity, or significantly low income, and accordingly are premised upon the dependency of the people who receive benefits, accounted for more than $57 billion. In her Letter of Transmittal forwarding the report to the President and congressional leaders, Chairperson Parrino stated that, if the Toward Independence recommendations were implemented, "current Federal expenditures for disability can be significantly redirected from dependency-related approaches to programs that enhance independence and productivity of people with disabilities, thereby engendering future efficiencies in federal spending." These sentiments were not posturing or disingenuous. I believe that the members of the Council were quite sincere and passionate advocates in advancing this rationale, and that this view led them to approve the report and its recommendations unanimously, and enthusiastically.
Continue to Part 16: A Last Minute Obstacle and a Horrible Twist of Fate